Can anyone stop ICE? - Today, Explained Recap

Podcast: Today, Explained

Published: 2026-01-14

Duration: 26 minutes

Guests: Madison McVann, Ian Milheiser

Summary

The episode examines the controversial surge of ICE operations in Minneapolis following the shooting of Renee Goode by an ICE agent, exploring the legal complexities and community responses.

What Happened

Following the death of Renee Goode at the hands of an ICE agent in Minneapolis, local communities have been actively tailing ICE officers to disrupt enforcement actions. Reporter Madison McVann provides insight into these grassroots efforts, noting that activists believe their presence deters ICE from making improper arrests. These community members often follow ICE vehicles, using group chats to coordinate their movements and document ICE actions.

Despite these efforts, activists face significant risks, as illustrated by the arrest and temporary detention of two observers, Patty and Ellie, who were following ICE vehicles. The incident intensified local resolve, with more residents now participating in these protective actions. McVann highlights the complex dynamics at play, where local activists are driven by a history of organized protests against law enforcement abuses, particularly in neighborhoods still reeling from George Floyd's murder.

The legal implications of ICE's actions come under scrutiny, as Vice President J.D. Vance claims ICE agents have 'absolute immunity,' a statement that misunderstands legal protections. Ian Milheiser, a legal expert, clarifies that while federal officers have certain immunities, these do not equate to absolute protections against all forms of legal accountability, especially in state prosecutions.

The federal investigation into Goode's death has raised concerns, with signs that it may not be conducted earnestly. Allegations include the exclusion of state police from the investigation and potential harassment of Goode's widow. This has led to skepticism about federal intentions and whether justice will be served.

The episode explores the broader implications of ICE's actions and the Trump administration's stance, which frames activists like Goode as domestic terrorists. This narrative conflicts with the activists' goal to protect their communities within the bounds of the law, highlighting a significant disconnect between federal rhetoric and local realities.

Milheiser notes that the Supreme Court has recently signaled a shift in how it views the prosecution of federal officers, suggesting that past doctrines like those from the 1890 case Inri Nigel may no longer offer the same protections. This evolving legal landscape could impact how state prosecutions against federal officers unfold, particularly in high-profile cases like Goode's.

Key Insights