Why does Keir Starmer keep promoting the friends of paedos? - My Ways (feat. Lil Jokey) - Single Recap
Podcast: My Ways (feat. Lil Jokey) - Single
Published: 2026-02-11
Duration: 46 minutes
Guests: Gabriel Sherman
Summary
Keir Starmer faces scrutiny for promoting Matthew Doyle, who campaigned for a sex offender, to the House of Lords. This raises questions about vetting processes and the judgment of political figures.
What Happened
Keir Starmer's political judgment is under fire after appointing Matthew Doyle to the House of Lords. Doyle, previously Starmer's communications chief, had campaigned for Sean Morton, a politician charged with possessing indecent images of children. This comes on the heels of another controversial appointment involving Peter Mandelson, leading to intense criticism from political opponents like Kemi Badenock and Stephen Flynn.
The vetting process and the role of Number 10 come into question, with claims that Doyle did not fully disclose his actions during the appointment process. The situation underscores a perceived lack of responsibility and curiosity in the vetting of candidates for significant roles in government.
The episode also delves into the criticisms of the House of Lords as a 'consolation prize' for political figures who lose their jobs, questioning its relevance and effectiveness.
Theresa May's decision to restore the whip to Charlie Alphic during a confidence vote despite sexual assault accusations is highlighted as an example of pragmatic political maneuvering.
Gabriel Sherman joins the conversation to discuss his book 'Bonfire of the Murdoch,' which explores the Murdoch family's internal dynamics, focusing on emotional abuse and succession struggles. Rupert Murdoch's reaction to Watergate and his motivations for building Fox News are discussed, painting a picture of a media mogul driven by profit over ideology.
The episode touches on the fractured Murdoch family dynamics, including a lawsuit in Reno, Nevada, where Rupert and his son Lachlan attempted to remove other family members from succession rights, ultimately settled to avoid family strife.
The Murdoch-Trump relationship is dissected, particularly Fox News's decision to call Arizona for Biden during the 2020 election, resulting in viewer loss to Newsmax. Murdoch's pragmatic approach to Trump's denialism post-January 6th insurrection is also examined.
Key Insights
- Keir Starmer's former communications chief, Matthew Doyle, pushed for a politician charged with child-related offenses, and now he's in the House of Lords. It's like giving a bad Yelp reviewer a Michelin star - and everyone's wondering how this slipped through the vetting cracks.
- The House of Lords is being called a 'consolation prize' for political figures who lose their jobs. Imagine losing your job only to be handed a lifetime gig with prestige - no wonder folks are questioning its relevance in modern governance.
- Theresa May's choice to restore the whip to Charlie Alphic during a confidence vote, despite sexual assault accusations, shows politics is often about playing chess, not checkers. It's a stark reminder of how political pragmatism can overshadow ethical dilemmas.
- Rupert Murdoch's empire is a Shakespearean drama with lawsuits and succession battles, yet it thrives on chaos. His family's struggle over power and control adds a whole new layer to the media mogul's legacy, proving that sometimes family drama can be more captivating than the headlines they create.